Скорее всего вот это ближе к теме:
Согласен. FOM это сбор и углубленный анализ полетной информации (по нашему вторичная обработка ПИ)
МС я согласен, что надо поизучать повниательнее АТА 2000. Тем более у них есть спец РГ по проблеме, мне как то попалась информация (правда уже состарилась
)
====================
SPEC2000 AIRCRAFT RELIABILITY DATA TASK FORCE
January 30-31, 2002 - Montreal, Canada
Meeting Summary
The SPEC2000 Aircraft Reliability Task Force met in Montreal, Canada on January 30-31, 2002 to begin the project of standardizing aircraft reliability informational practices which are currently exchanged in various formats between airline operators, aircraft/engine manufacturers, and maintenance/overhaul facilities.
The meeting was attended by representatives from airlines, aircraft/engine manufacturers and suppliers, and industry associations. Please refer to the attendance list.
The summary below follows generally the published agenda of the meeting.
1. Welcome and Introduction
The Chairman of the Task Force, Geoff Chick (AC), opened the session by welcoming all. Each participant then introduced himself/herself and stated his/her expectation for this meeting.
2. Anti-Trust Guidelines
Jim Casey (ATA, VP& Deputy General Counsel) reviewed the ATA Anti-Trust statement and cautioned Task Force participants to stay within its guidelines. (Click here to view Document )
3. SPEC2000 Overview & History
Brad Ballance (ATA, VP e-Business) presented an overview of the SPEC2000 Program, its history as a standard as well as a centralized database system for collecting aircraft part information. (Click here to view Presentation)
4. Review of SPEC2000 Reliability Data Collection/Exchange (SPEC2000, Chapter 11)
In order to build on the result of work already accomplished,
a) John Nazareth (Bombardier) presented a historical view of the previous task force that produced the initial chapter on component reliability data in SPEC2000,
b) John Yakubowski (Boeing) summarized the most important elements contained in the current chapter. Please refer to SPEC2000, Chapter 11 (printable copy is posted on
http://www.spec2000.com/, under 'Specifications'.)
5. Collection & Exchange of Aircraft Reliability Data by the READI Group
Peter White (FedEx) presented an overview of the READI group, its mission and achievements. As with other, similar projects to improve aircraft reliability procedures, the READI Group offers a great deal of synergy to the current standardization effort.
6. Overview of Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) Project
Graham Brum (Pennant PLC) gave an overview of the Product Life Cycle Support Project.
7. Aircraft Maintenance Data Collection & Exchange - Airframers' Point of View
John Yakubowski (Boeing) and Catherine Simonne-Jondot (Airbus) jointly presented, also on behalf of the airframers Bombardier and Embraer, a detailed strategy to proceed with the data collection effort. The presenters emphasized the importance of working with a representative cross-section of reliability experts, so that added value to the industry through this data standardization effort is assured.
To this end, the airframers offered to develop a 'straw horse' document outlining sample aircraft reliability requirements to start the definition process. The draft document will include aircraft reliability data requirements that the airframers have jointly identified through their efforts with the industry.
8. Develop Task Force Mission Statement
To officially begin the work of this Task Force, Geoff Chick (AC) led a discussion to define a mission statement and scope for the work ahead. By the end of the meeting, the Task Force agreed to the following:
Mission Statement of the Aircraft Reliability Task Force
CREATE A STANDARD FOR THE COLLECTION AND EXCHANGE OF AIRCRAFT RELIABILITY AND MAINTENANCE DATA THAT MEETS THE NEEDS OF A GLOBAL AIR TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY.
9. Scope of Task Force
The following scope statement was agreed to by the Task Force:
Scope of Aircraft Reliability Data Task Force
1. Aircraft data – This data contains aircraft type certification information such as model, manufacturer’s serial number, engine type, date of manufacturer, date in service, owner, operator, and registration number.
2. Aircraft logbook data - This data contains information that was written up by pilots, cabin crews and maintenance crews concerning aircraft discrepancies. It also includes the corrective actions taken by maintenance personnel.
3. Aircraft event data - This data contains significant events such as mechanical dispatch delays, cancellations, substitutions, air and ground turnbacks, diversions, incidents, and structural difficulties.
4. Scheduled maintenance/dock maintenance data - This data contains information concerning scheduled maintenance performed during inspection intervals as called out in the Maintenance Planning Documents.
5. Aircraft Configuration Control – Part Number, Serial Number, Service Bulletins, Airworthiness Directives, CNs, etc.
6. Other Issues – Direct Maintenance Costs, Significant Events, Performed Flights (with qualification by flight particularities), Scheduled Flights, Aircraft Messages, Technical Incidents (Smoke in Cabin, Hydraulic System Loss, Structural Cracks, etc.), Corrosion Prevention Control Program, Aircraft Availability, etc.
===========
Надо будет поискать что там новенького у них...