Новости Rolls-Royce

А есть где-нибудь хорошая фотография ultrafan-a на стенде сзади?
Воздухозаборник у него, естественно, стендовый... но он весь зад закрывает... а там должно быть сформированное сопло второго контура.
Что-то типа такого:
UF-Trent-100-%C3%97-141.429-mm-1.png
 
Реклама
...там должно быть сформированное сопло второго контура.
Есть такая вот картиночка - выразительная.
UKRI-040423-HorizonEuropeGuaranteeCaseStudy-RollsRoyceCleanAviation.jpg


Но даже притом, что здесь ну очень длинный заборник (характерный для "новых" роллсовских движков), удлинение внешнего контура порядка единицы.
 
Если я не путаю, то это Trent ALPS, который стоит на А350.
это опытный Трент 1000 с вентилятором Ультрафана, но выполненном в размерности 1000-го Трента. Перед тем, как делать полноразмерный (3,56 метра) они сначала погоняли его на стенде и на ЛЛ (на базе 747-200) в диаметре 2.8 м
 
Есть такая вот картиночка - выразительная.
UKRI-040423-HorizonEuropeGuaranteeCaseStudy-RollsRoyceCleanAviation.jpg


Но даже притом, что здесь ну очень длинный заборник (характерный для "новых" роллсовских движков), удлинение внешнего контура порядка единицы.
Это для проекта HEAVEN на водороде Hydrogen Engine Architecture Virtually Engineered
 
Есть такая вот картиночка - выразительная.
но это не Ультрафан в его окончательном (по кр.мере на настоящий момент) виде. Тут вижу схему вроде бы 1+3+9--1+1+4. А Ультрафан нынче 1+4+9--2+1+7.
Тут вот хорошо видно, насколько они изменили схему, по сравнению с Трентами:
Trent-XWB-to-Advance.png
 
Rolls-Royce ожидает что в ближайшее недели новые диски для Trent 1000 HPT будут одобренны FAA. Это позволит вдвое увеличить срок эксплуатации двигателя (time-on-wing) на 787.

Так же к концу года улучшения затронут Trent 7000 for the Airbus A330neo. Ожидется что time-on-wing улучшится на 30%

 
Rolls-Royce ожидает что в ближайшее недели новые диски для Trent 1000 HPT будут одобренны FAA. Это позволит вдвое увеличить срок эксплуатации двигателя (time-on-wing) на 787.
Посмотрим, конечно. Но к настоящему моменту RR практически полностью слил GE рынок двигателей для 787.
 
Посмотрим, конечно. Но к настоящему моменту RR практически полностью слил GE рынок двигателей для 787.
Двигателисты за последние 10 лет стали самой брльшой головной болью. Причем все с той или иной моделью. Пожалуй кроме CFM. Нелегко им дается новое поколение двигателей.
 
Strong Warning From AerCap CEO to Airbus and Boeing: “Don’t Build New Aircraft, Fix the Existing Ones”

Angus Kelly, CEO of AerCap, one of the world’s largest aircraft leasing companies, has sharply criticized Airbus and Boeing’s plans to develop a new generation of narrow-body aircraft. Addressing both manufacturers, Kelly said: “Don’t come up with new projects. Make your existing aircraft work properly.”

Kelly acknowledged that the Boeing 737 MAX 8 is a successful model, and noted that the yet-to-be-certified 737 MAX 7 and MAX 10 could also enhance Boeing’s competitiveness. However, he raised serious concerns about the reliability of current models, stating that today’s aircraft tend to have more issues compared to previous generations. “Please don’t come to me saying you’re trying something new. I want the aircraft you’ve already built to perform better,” he said.

Kelly’s main criticism targeted engine performance. He pointed out the widespread component replacement needs of Pratt & Whitney’s GTF engines and emphasized that CFM Leap engines lack sufficient durability under harsh operational conditions. Due to these problems, he noted that up to one-third of GTF-powered aircraft could be grounded at any given moment.

 
Статья от Dragon Aviation Capital

The Rolls-Royce Trent 1 000 was meant to power the future of long-haul flight. Instead, it grounded fleets and disrupted major airline schedules.

The problems began with cracks in the intermediate pressure turbine blades. Corrosion and fatigue cut engine life short, forcing airlines like Virgin Atlantic and British Airways to cancel flights and delay route launches. At its worst, the FAA slashed ETOPS clearance from 330 to 140 minutes— crippling ultra-long-haul flexibility.

Virgin Atlantic delayed its Sao Paulo and Accra routes. British Airways pulled back from Dallas and Kuwait. Rolls-Royce is now rolling out a fix: redesigned turbine blades and durability upgrades. But parts are scarce, and engine shop wait times remain long.

The Trent 1 000's issues aren't expected to clear up until at least 2026. In the meantime, airlines are rerouting aircraft, leasing alternatives, and counting the cost of lost trust.


Screenshot_20250509_073603.jpg
 
Реклама
По-моему, все три из big three сильно переэдвансили...
Т.е. заявили (и даже сертифицировали) на новое поколение двигателей параметры и эксплуатационные характеристики, к которым они СИСТЕМНО не готовы.
 
По-моему, все три из big three сильно переэдвансили...
Т.е. заявили (и даже сертифицировали) на новое поколение двигателей параметры и эксплуатационные характеристики, к которым они СИСТЕМНО не готовы.
компаниями больше не руководят инженеры, а руководят менеджеры. им нужно продавать имидж чтобы росли акции компании и их бонусы
 
компаниями больше не руководят инженеры, а руководят менеджеры. им нужно продавать имидж чтобы росли акции компании и их бонусы
...вот это и называется "системно не готовы в инженерно-техническом и производственном плане"...
 
Статья из Aviation Week

1746963286664.png


PROPULSION

Rolls' Boeing 787/Airbus A330neo Durability Upgrade Nears End Goal​

> TURBINE LIFE LIMITS TO BE LIFTED > CERTIFICATION ON 787 IS EXPECTED WITHIN MONTHS​

Guy Norris,
May 5, 2025

Rolls' Boeing 787/Airbus A330neo Durability Upgrade Nears End Goal

PROPULSION

> TURBINE LIFE LIMITS TO BE LIFTED > CERTIFICATION ON 787 IS EXPECTED WITHIN MONTHS

Guy Norris

London

Rolls-Royce’s long-running campaign to improve the time on wing of two key engines—the Trent 7000 on the Airbus A330neo and its sister Trent 1000 TEN on the Boeing 787—is entering its final phase with the start of tests on a second set of durability enhancements.

Designed to boost time on wing by a further 30%, the second package follows an initial set of upgrades that doubled time on wing for the Trent 7000powered Airbus since its introduction in late 2022. The same basic upgrade package now flying on the A330neo recently completed flight tests with Boeing and is expected to be certified for the 787 in the coming months.

Dubbed the Durability Enhancement (DE) packages Phase 1 and 2, the upgrades focus on increasing the resilience of the high-pressure (HP) turbine blade and its associated hot-section components (see graphic on facing page). The earlier design proved vulnerable to wear and cracking, leading to mandated life limits and frequent inspections—shortcomings that have affected operators and proven damaging to Rolls in terms of cost, reputation and market share on the 787.

Prior to the introduction of Phase 1, Trent 7000s were being removed from A330neos at 1,000 flight cycles. “We’re now getting to 2,000 [cycles] and will be at 2,500 as we work our way through the rest of this year, so that’s more than double the time on wing,” Trent 7000 Chief Engineer Paul Sixsmith says. “That just means the engines are out there for so much longer. Operators are not having to do engine removals. We’re not having to induct engines into our shops, so it’s a virtuous cycle.”

TRENT 1000 TEN Durability Enhancement Packages

Phase 1

1 New high-pressure turbine blade with increased flow and optimized aerofoil and shroud film cooling

2 New combustor rear inner case to deliver the increased high-pressure turbine blade cooling flow

3 New fuel spray nozzle with a conical cut back to reduce smoke emissions

4 Full-authority digital engine control software change

Phase 2

5 New advanced coatings on combustor tiles for hot and sandy environments

6 High-pressure nozzle guide vane film cooling changes and coating optimization

7 High-pressure turbine blade shroud weight reduction and blade coating optimization

8 Trent XWB-84-style design improvements to the combustor/high-pressure nozzle interface for reduced wear

Source: Rolls-Royce

The improvements have been hardwon and cannot come quickly enough for Rolls. “The position we’re in today is not acceptable for us,” Sixsmith says. “It’s clearly unpalatable for our customers, and it means that we must do more shop visits. Considering where we are operationally, as we get out of that situation, it all starts to flow when we are more than doubling that time on wing.”

For the 787, on which Rolls competes with GE Aerospace’s GEnx-lB, the move is critical to the company’s battle to regain dwindling market share. “It just restores confidence back into those Trent 1000 operators today, as well as future people that want to buy the jet and the Trent 1000 TEN,” Sixsmith says. “Clearly, with Boeing as well, it is important to show that we can do it, and this makes us truly competitive with the other guys.”

The new HP turbine blade at the heart of the Phase 1 package features a 40% increase in shroud film cooling airflow, with added cooling holes in the midchord section and an enlarged hole in the root for higher flow from a redesigned combustor rear inner case. Supporting modifications include revisions to the engine control software for an updated combustor light-up pattern and turbine gas temperature trim, which is a parameter used to adjust the fuel control unit for setting idle RPM and maximum speed for the engine pressure ratio. The new fuel spray nozzle is designed to reduce smoke emissions and offset revisions to the combustor rear inner case.

In parallel to introducing the upgrade into the A330neo fleet, Rolls has conducted a series of engine tests simulating more than 3,000 cycles—or more than five years of continuous in-service operation—with the Phase 1 package.

“We’ve now just completed this additional cyclic test and inspected the parts, and with that—in combination with our other fleet understanding— we’ve got to the point where we’re starting to release more and more life on that blade,” Sixsmith says. “I’ve got bench data that supports where I want to go.”

As many of the initial operators with DE Phase 1 packages fly their aircraft on high-cycle, low-hour flights, the first upgraded Trent 7000s are coming in for shop visits. “We’ve taken out the blades, and I’m more than happy for them to run for another 1,000 or 2,000 cycles, as they’re in a great condition,” Sixsmith says.

Having released the HP turbine blade life to 2,500 cycles, he says, “as we progress through this year and early next year, we’re actually going to completely remove that limit.” At that point, the engine will switch to an on-condition maintenance and inspection protocol, bringing it into line with other members of the Trent family.

Now the focus is on testing the second enhancement package, which Rolls hopes will form the basis for a finalized build standard for both Trent 1000 TENs and 7000s starting in 2026. “Package Two is the next generation, because we’re starting to go again,” Sixsmith says. “My intention is that as we get to the end of 2025 and enter into 2026, the DE Phase 2 modification package will overtake DE Phase 1 and it will be certified and released as a package that builds on DE Phase 1.”

The second package incorporates an advanced calcium-magnesiumalumino-silicate-resistant coating on the combustor tiles for hot and sandy environments, as well as changes to the film cooling on the HP nozzle guide vanes (see graphic on page 51). Also included are Trent XWB-84-style design improvements to the combustor/ HP nozzle interface for reduced wear and a redesigned, lighter-weight HP turbine blade shroud.

“Package Two makes a series of discrete changes to some of the hot-end statics and the blade itself, and some very minor changes to the combustor for durability purposes,” Sixsmith says. “We’re taking some parasitic weight out of the blade shroud, using electrical discharge machining to take out small amounts of material to reduce mass.”

As stress is a function of speed squared, a weight decrease will result in lighter loads on the blade. “Therefore, the stress on all the features is dramatically reduced as well,” he notes. “On the static components, we’re redistributing the air, and we’re changing the way we mount it as well in the system. So we’re taking some experience from our other engines and reading that across to how we locate the system and hold it in place within the engine.”

Type testing on the first engine with the DE Phase 2 package, meanwhile, is underway at Rolls’ facility in Derby, England, and is expected to continue through May. A second engine destined for dedicated endurance testing is also in build and will follow in the next few months.

“Because we’re targeting how we want to exercise some of those components, we’re picking a cycle that goes after the static parts,” he says.

DE Phase 2 testing will include a “one-shot” thermal paint test—an evaluation also conducted on DE Phase 1. “It’s called one-shot because you’ve got one go at getting it right,” Sixsmith explains. Upgraded components are coated in a special paint with temperature capabilities spanning 220-1,350C, and typically have five or more change points. During a prescribed test cycle, the paints change color irreversibly with temperature, providing a complete surface temperature record that can be compared with modeling predictions.

Testing is largely expected to be completed by midyear, although some may extend into the early part of the third quarter. “We’re targeting for all our certification documentation to be in place so we can bring all that together for the end of this year,” Sixsmith says, adding that the scope of the second package will not require the same level of certification as the initial upgrade.

“We were very careful on Durability Enhancement Package 2 that we didn’t find ourselves having to do certification work that went above and beyond the threshold for the next level of integration and oversight that you need to do either at engine level or regulator aircraft level,” Sixsmith says. “The changes that we’ve introduced are enhancements that we are able to certify with minimal additional work.”

With tests underway, Rolls is also working with the supply chain to ensure readiness for industrializing the changes and introducing them into the production line as well as for retrofit during maintenance, repair and overhaul. The company aims to release the modification in full for production by the second quarter of 2026.

“We’re now in a position that about 75% of the flying fleet [with more than 150 A330neos in service] has been rolled to the DE 1 package,” Sixsmith says. This has been through newproduction engines delivered starting in September 2022 as well as earlier ones coming through maintenance, repair and overhaul shops. Some early engines will never see the Phase 1 package and will go straight to Phase 2 on their next shop visits, he notes.

Sixsmith says he “sees the daylight” now at the end of Rolls’ long running campaign to bring the same upgrades to the Trent 1000 TEN on the 787. Plans to pursue approval on the 787 have been frustrated by the slowdown in new certification activity at Boeing amid heightened regulatory scrutiny following the 737 MAX accidents as well as other safety and quality missteps. The resulting backlog of certification delays with the 737-7 and -10 and 777X programs has had a knock-on effect on Boeing’s ability to flight-test the engine upgrade. This work was Anally completed in January.

“We’re counting the weeks and months now to get the formal FAA certification release,” Sixsmith says. “We’re working the final few reports through with Boeing, and we are on track to get that out to our customers, certainly, in the next few months.”

The DE Phase 2 modification on test in Derby has the same bill of material for both engines. “The certification plan that goes with that is actually two pieces of standardization—one that will go to Boeing for the read across to the 787 and one that goes to Airbus for the A330neo as well,” he says. “It’s exactly the same modification, and we’re driving them at exactly the same pace. Our desire is that the solution arrives at the same time with a service bulletin for both the Trent 7000 and Trent 1000TEN in 2026.”

By then, Rolls also aims to realign the supply chain. “By the end of 2026, I only want to be producing one standard of material,” Sixsmith adds.
 
Последнее редактирование:
Как тут на форуме любят говорить: "Люди же работают!"
 

1746965166164.png

GETTING SERIOUS​

> ROLLS-ROYCE PROVES INTENT ON SMALL ULTRAFAN DESIGN > TESTS OF LARGE GEARED ULTRAFAN ARE PLANNED TO RESUME THIS YEAR > ANOTHER GOAL IS TO SHORTEN ALL-NEW ENGINE DEVELOPMENT​

Guy NorrisMay 52025
GETTING SERIOUS
PROPULSION
Rolls durability upgrade p. 50 GCAP engine plans p. 53
> ROLLS-ROYCE PROVES INTENT ON SMALL ULTRAFAN DESIGN > TESTS OF LARGE GEARED ULTRAFAN ARE PLANNED TO RESUME THIS YEAR > ANOTHER GOAL IS TO SHORTEN ALL-NEW ENGINE DEVELOPMENT
Guy Norris
London
Rolls-Royce’s renewed push to commercialize the geared UltraFan concept for next-generation single-aisles and widebodies is accelerating—it plans to resume tests of a full-scale large engine this year and, in parallel, freeze the design of a smaller demonstrator.
Reenergized by a late 2023 call from then-new CEO Tufan Erginbilgic to target the engine technology at the replacement markets for the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737, the prospects for the UltraFan—like those of Rolls itself—appear to be brightening. Bolstered by board-level commitments to evaluate the geared design over two power range sweet spots—the 30,000-lb.-plus and 80,000-lb.-thrust ranges—the company is doubling down on its growth ambitions for the next decade and beyond.
“The UltraFan is effectively the successor to the Trent family in widebodies, and it allows us to get into narrowbodies in a partnership,” says Alan Newby, Rolls’ director of aerospace technology and future programs. “I’m basically putting in place the program that allows the company to get there.”
The past two years of renewed faith in the UltraFan under Erginbilgic contrast sharply with an earlier period of slowdown and uncertainty for the concept following Rolls’ 2019 decision to decouple the engine development from Boeing’s proposed new midmarket airplane (NMA) project. With no new widebodies in the offing and the NMA later canceled, Rolls was forced to push the engine’s planned service entry to at least the late 2020s and to pare a multi-engine demonstrator program back to a single unit.
In the past five years, however, competition for a next-generation narrowbody has heated up while prospects for widebody applications remain rooted in longer-term potential reengining upgrades of current models.
“I don’t know whether it’s going to be a widebody first, a narrowbody first, Boeing first or Airbus first,” Newby says. “So we’ve got to make sure that we are ready for any eventuality from the market perspective, and we’ve got the technology proven at both scales.
“That’s effectively what I’m trying to do at the moment—make sure we’ve got the data on both large and small engines so we’re ready to go when the market decides which way it’s going to jump,” he continues. “We are rebuilding Engine 1 [the first UltraFan demonstrator] now, and our plan is to get that ready to test by the end of this year. In parallel, we’ve got another engine that we’re rebuilding, and that one will go on to do further testing and possibly other assets on top of that one.
“Whatever happens regarding airframe strategies and any partner strategies that can happen, we want to make sure that we’ve got the technology ready and proven at that scale so that we’re ready to adapt,” Newby adds. The broader strategy includes renewed investment in tests of the larger UltraFan, which Rolls will continue to develop in parallel.
The single-aisle engine demonstrator is scheduled to undergo ground tests in 2028 and is intended to pave the way for a 30,000-lb.-thrust-plusclass engine designed—at this stage, at least—to power any new 150-seater or larger design. To be configured with a fan diameter of80-90 in., the demonstrator design envelope is deliberately broad. “At the end of the day, we will probably have different requirements from different airframers,” Newby says. “So where do I want to put my demonstrator? It might not align with any specific requirement, but it will be broadly what the market is going to need.” He adds that he expects the design to be frozen by midyear.
Positioned to compete in the same thrust bracket as the Open Fan being developed by CFM International joint-venture partners GE Aerospace and Safran, as well as a next-generation variant of Pratt & Whitney’s PW1100G geared turbofan (GTF), the demonstrator plan is as much a statement of intent as it is an engineering necessity. “The reason for doing that is manyfold,” Newby says. “One is to show to our customers that we’re serious about it, show to our suppliers that we’re serious about it and also show to our potential partners that we’re serious about it.”
The small UltraFan initiative leverages design elements developed for Rolls-Royce’s Pearl 700 and 10X business jet engines based on the company’s Advance2 core project. It also leans on technologies from Heaven (Hydrogen Engine Architecture Virtually Engineered Novelly), an ongoing project under Europe’s Clean Aviation research initiative aimed specifically at scaling the UltraFan architecture to suit short-medium-range (SMR) applications.
Targeting a 20% integrated fuelburn reduction and the ability to use sustainable aviation fuel and hydrogen, the Heaven project has included tests of an advanced power gearbox and designs of an improved combustor and a new intermediate-pressure turbine. Further tests planned for the second half of the project include completion of the preliminary design of an SMR engine and validation of elements to a technology readiness level (TRL) of 5. “Clean Aviation Phase 2 is about taking those to demonstration, so clearly that’s an opportunity to put something like this into that program,” Newby says.
“We also continue to work closely with the [UK Aerospace Technology Institute] and in Germany as well,” he adds. “So there’s a range of funding sources we can use on that one, but it fits well with the calls in Europe at the moment.” Although remaining coy about reports in The Financial Times that Rolls is in talks with the UK government to help fund part of the estimated $3.9 billion development cost for the smaller UltraFan, the company states: “We believe narrowbody represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver a step change in growth for the UK economy.”
But while intent and ambition may be one thing, winning a slot on an allnew aircraft—when finally launched— is another, particularly when CFM’s Revolutionary Innovation for Sustainable Engines, the main challenger, is banking on the higher bypass ratio of an open fan to offer fuel efficiency levels north of 20%. To earn its way on, Rolls is counting on three major elements: maximizing the benefits of the geared architecture, integrating the engine and airframe more closely than ever before and turning the ducted design from a perceived disadvantage to an advantage.
“Any aerodynamics student will say that on a pure propulsive efficiency basis, an open fan will give you an advantage over lower bypass ratios—we accept that,” Newby says. “But then you’ve got to install it and make sure you can handle the noise and accommodate the fan blade off. You have to make sure you know how the propeller interacts with the wing.”
Pratt & Whitney’s GTF and the largescale UltraFan have proven the concept works. “We’re looking today at ‘Generation 1’ geared engines, and we know there’s more to come from increasing the bypass ratio, so we’re not stuck there,” he says. Instead of the 11:1 bypass ratio of the current CFM Leap-IA on the A320neo, for example, Newby says the SMR design could target a bypass ratio of around 15:1.
“Once we’ve got the gear in there, you might as well make use of it, so let’s go bigger on bypass ratio,” he says. The single-aisle UltraFan variant also will increase gear reduction ratio beyond the 4:1 of the larger-scale demonstrator, he adds. Gear ratio is largely linked to bypass ratio, as this determines the speed of the fan. The purpose of interposing the gear between the fan and turbine is to slow the former while allowing the latter to run at its higher optimum speed. “The gear ratio drops out in the wash,” Newby says. “Even if we scale down, we think the gearbox architecture is robust for that, and part of what we were doing in Heaven was looking at the gearbox at the smaller size.
“The other thing is, let’s make the duct our friend, not our enemy,” he explains. “Why transfer the burden of containment and acoustic attenuation to the fuselage? We think there are better things you can do within the nacelle to make that more aerodynamically efficient but also in the way you integrate it with the aircraft as well. Particularly when you get these really big engines, which have a profound impact on the wing, then we’re pretty confident that by working together with the nacelle manufacturer and the airframer, there’s more to come on that one.
“We are very happy with the choices we’ve made in terms of staying ducted,” Newby continues. “There’s a view that a geared engine is a stationary thing— it’s kind of reached the end of its development. Far from it. We’ve only had our first iteration [from which] we think there’s much more to come on both the fundamentals of bypass ratio, which you can enable through a new aircraft, but also through the nacelle itself and the way you integrate it.”
In recognition of the UltraFan’s longer-than-expected road to real-time applications, Rolls also is updating the concept where needed. “We want to make sure that it’s still the best technology we can do, so I’ve got a research and technology program running on next-gen turbine technology, compressor and so forth, and we’ll be looking to feed that in as we learn stuff,” Newby says.“That doesn’t change the fundamental architecture, and if I can put a better turbine in when I come to launch the product, or a better compressor, then I will do that to make sure that we’ve got the most competitive product that we can at that time.”
Against this background, Rolls also is studying whether it can shorten the multiyear development cycle for an allnew engine. “Why does it have to be seven years?” Newby asks. “So we’re doing quite a lot of work on digital design, for example. Can we improve the methodology through which we design and test these vehicles so I can speed up the design process through greater use of [artificial intelligence], for example, and greater analytical techniques? Can I reduce the dependency on physical testing? Can I do more through analysis and computers also? We’re not taking those seven years for granted. We’re saying, ‘Can we improve our design and analysis processes such that we can shorten the time to market?”’
In the meantime, “there’s no time to waste,” Newby says. “That’s why we’re designing this smaller model, and that’s why we’re rebuilding the big one. We’ve got to get on with it. I’ve basically got to deliver technology readiness to TRL 6 by somewhere between 2028 and 2030.”
 
Последнее редактирование:
Как тут на форуме любят говорить: "Люди же работают!"
человек постоянно "бросает вызов" новым технологиям. RR BR710 выглядит как привычным в плане архитектуры, а вот GE для меня как alien machine. Выглядит просто, но уровень исполнения просто впечатляет
 
Назад